Skip to content

How we help

The problems we are usually brought in to solve.

These are capability descriptions, not customer case studies. They reflect the kind of cloud and platform work DeClouder does and how we approach it.

A note on evidence

We do not publish anonymized case studies with invented metrics. If you want references or a detailed walk-through of comparable work, ask during the first conversation and we will talk specifics with the people who did it.

Stabilizing a Kubernetes environment

What we usually see

  • Pods restart for reasons nobody has traced
  • Cluster upgrades are deferred because they feel risky
  • Resource requests and limits were guessed once and never revisited
  • Autoscaling behaves unpredictably under load

How we approach it

Establish what the cluster is actually doing, fix the failure modes that recur, get resource and scaling configuration onto a rational basis, and bring cluster and add-on upgrades into a repeatable process.

  • EKS
  • Kubernetes
  • Helm
  • Karpenter / autoscaling
  • Prometheus

Modernizing Terraform and Infrastructure as Code

What we usually see

  • Console changes have drifted from what the code describes
  • One large state file makes every change feel dangerous
  • Copy-pasted configuration across environments
  • No one is confident running a plan against production

How we approach it

Reconcile drift, split state along sane boundaries, factor shared configuration into modules, and put changes behind a plan-and-review workflow so infrastructure changes stop being events.

  • Terraform
  • Terraform modules
  • Remote state
  • Policy and review gates

Improving CI/CD and delivery

What we usually see

  • Deploys need a specific person or a manual runbook
  • Pipelines are slow enough that engineers batch changes
  • Rollback means redeploying an older branch and hoping
  • Build configuration differs per service for no deliberate reason

How we approach it

Standardize how services build, test and deploy; make pipelines fast enough to run on every change; and make rollback an ordinary, rehearsed operation rather than an incident response.

  • GitHub Actions
  • GitLab CI
  • Container builds
  • Deployment automation

Migrating workloads to AWS

What we usually see

  • Workloads sit on infrastructure that is expensive or unsupported
  • A migration has been planned repeatedly but never owned
  • Uncertainty about which AWS services fit the workload
  • Cutover risk is unclear, so the decision keeps sliding

How we approach it

Assess the workload and its dependencies, choose target services deliberately, build the target environment in code, and run a rehearsed cutover with a defined rollback path.

  • AWS
  • VPC and networking
  • RDS
  • ECS / EKS
  • Terraform

Building observability

What we usually see

  • Incidents are discovered by customers first
  • Dashboards exist but nobody trusts them
  • Logs are collected but hard to search when it matters
  • Alerts are noisy enough that people have stopped reading them

How we approach it

Instrument what actually indicates health, consolidate logs and metrics where engineers will look, and reduce alerting to signals a human should act on.

  • CloudWatch
  • Prometheus / Grafana
  • OpenTelemetry
  • Centralized logging
  • Alert routing

Reducing operational toil

What we usually see

  • Routine work is manual, repetitive and undocumented
  • The same questions reach the same engineer every week
  • Onboarding an environment takes days of tribal knowledge
  • Application engineers spend significant time on infrastructure

How we approach it

Identify the recurring manual work, automate what should never be manual, document what must stay manual, and move routine requests onto self-service paths.

  • Automation scripting
  • Terraform
  • Internal tooling
  • Runbooks

Troubleshooting difficult production infrastructure issues

What we usually see

  • Intermittent failures that nobody has been able to reproduce
  • Latency or networking problems that cross service boundaries
  • Symptoms that appear under load and vanish under inspection
  • An issue that has been open long enough to become normal

How we approach it

Work the problem systematically — narrow it with evidence from logs, metrics and configuration rather than by guessing — then fix the cause and leave behind the instrumentation that would catch it next time.

  • AWS networking
  • Kubernetes internals
  • Log and metric analysis
  • Load testing

Improving security and reliability posture

What we usually see

  • IAM permissions are broader than anyone intended
  • Backups exist but restores have never been tested
  • No agreed process for patching or vulnerability remediation
  • Single points of failure that everyone knows about and nobody owns

How we approach it

Tighten access to what is actually needed, harden the infrastructure layer, verify that recovery works by testing it, and remove the failure points that would matter most.

  • IAM
  • AWS security services
  • Backup and recovery
  • Patch and remediation workflow

Engagement model

How an engagement gets started.

Four steps, none of them long. The point of the early ones is to avoid agreeing to a scope neither side understands.

  1. 01

    Conversation

    You describe the environment and what is getting in the way. We tell you honestly whether this is work we are the right people for.

  2. 02

    Assessment

    We look at the actual infrastructure — accounts, code, pipelines, monitoring — and come back with what we found and what we would do about it.

  3. 03

    Agreed scope

    We define what we own, what stays with your team, and how support and coverage work. An ongoing engagement, a scoped project, or both.

  4. 04

    Delivery and ownership

    We do the work, keep the documentation current, and stay accountable for the agreed scope. Work outside it gets scoped separately.

Recognize one of these?

Tell us which one and what you are running. We will come back with how we would approach it and whether it is a project or ongoing work.